The rich, as famously explained by F. Scott Fitzgerald, are not like you and me, and never having been rich, I've always assumed he probably knew what he was writing about and left it at that. The same, I suspect, goes for the famous (and/or infamous) and probably for about the same reason.
Gwyneth Paltrow is, for me, one of those folks who prove any and all assertions about wealth, fame, and intelligence especially how they are often not apportioned in anything resembling a fair distribution. How else to explain this incredible example of SERIOUSLY?
Talk about a compelling argument for cursing the darkness.
-bill kenny
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
So these Are the Good, Old Days?
I attended Norwich City Council meetings since the winter of 1993 when those on that Council and the members of the Board of Education diffe...
-
Labor Day 2024. Robber Barons, Mega Banks and Wall Street: too much. Working Poor, Middle Class and Main Street: never enough. There once ... -
Many years ago, we taught history in our schools because we studied history to learn from it as opposed to now, when we denigrate it and bel...
2 comments:
...just when I thought naming a child "Apple" was the most traumatizing thing she could do to one of her children, she proves me wrong.
I'd hope when they 'consciously uncoupled' Chris Martin didn't get saddled with paying for counseling as I suspect Moses just ended up booking another decade on a couch somewhere after being a prop in Mom's self-aggrandizing video.
Post a Comment