The rich, as famously explained by F. Scott Fitzgerald, are not like you and me, and never having been rich, I've always assumed he probably knew what he was writing about and left it at that. The same, I suspect, goes for the famous (and/or infamous) and probably for about the same reason.
Gwyneth Paltrow is, for me, one of those folks who prove any and all assertions about wealth, fame, and intelligence especially how they are often not apportioned in anything resembling a fair distribution. How else to explain this incredible example of SERIOUSLY?
Talk about a compelling argument for cursing the darkness.
-bill kenny
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Labor Day 2024. Robber Barons, Mega Banks and Wall Street: too much. Working Poor, Middle Class and Main Street: never enough. There once ... -
Very much narrow casting today, to (in general) New England , because that's where American History is made, and more specifically to w...
2 comments:
...just when I thought naming a child "Apple" was the most traumatizing thing she could do to one of her children, she proves me wrong.
I'd hope when they 'consciously uncoupled' Chris Martin didn't get saddled with paying for counseling as I suspect Moses just ended up booking another decade on a couch somewhere after being a prop in Mom's self-aggrandizing video.
Post a Comment