I once worked for a boss who used to say “I dislike
telling other people how to suck eggs” which I understood to mean each of us arrives
at his decision in his own way. We all see opportunities differently but missed
opportunities are more universally recognized.
I
worked for a boss who often said “I dislike telling other people how to suck
eggs” which, I understood to mean each of us makes decisions in his own way. We
all see opportunities differently but missed opportunities are more universally
recognized.
I’m
trying to remember that point even if I feel a little like Foghorn Leghorn
walking on egg shells after last Monday’s City Council vote on the next city budget and the Council’s declination to add funding to both the instrumental
music and world language programs (‘frills’ neighboring towns have) for
children in Norwich Public Schools because at least two Council members didn’t
feel there was any guarantee the added money would be spent on those programs.
By
state statute and City Charter the council has
the power to revise only the total estimated expenditures of the Board of
Education, not line-items. Within its budget, the Board determines where the
money is spent. Much of the Charter has been around since the early fifties, so
it’s been like this for six plus decades and yet this year, it suddenly became
a concern. I assumed Council members were familiar with the city charter by the time they take the oath of office.
Speaking
of assumptions, trust in the word of the other elected city body with whom you
meet during every budget formulation season, would (I’d hope), be paramount in
the Council/Board relationship. Leaving me to wonder if integrity was the
underlying issue last Monday night.
Many
homeowners are unhappy about the perfect storm created by revaluation and the
increase in their mill rate. I understand the anger but am concerned that one
of those who voted “no” seemed to link those taxes to education expenditures
rather than to the continuing failure to grow the commercial portion of the
Grand List.
When
Norwich school children reach NFA, the same high school to which neighboring communities
send their children, our kids could populate to greater numbers remedial
classes in many academic disciplines that our schools could not offer
fundamental skills at the elementary level. Why? Perhaps because we chose to save money that
we didn’t save at all.
This
raises the price for NFA's education services to Norwich students, a cost borne
by the city resulting in increased outlays from an already strained Board of
Education budget, which in turn, leaves even LESS money to educate
children. And round and round goes the gossip.
Quality
of education, as has been frequently reported, together with 'opportunities for
employment,' is a critical determinant families (and businesses seeking workers
and customers) use when deciding on relocation/expansion.
We should pay now or we shall pay
later and later is always more expensive.
Norwich
still lacks a coherent and cohesive economic development strategy integrating
personal and community growth and enrichment. No wonder so many residents
perceive themselves as caught in a vice of spiraling taxes and diminishing
municipal services, whether such a perception is true or not.
We
had a chance to change direction last Monday but chose, instead, the well-trod path of take-no-risks that always leads us nowhere and guarantees a less than
zero reward.
-bill kenny
No comments:
Post a Comment